Home Create my own Portal Premium function, contact us! Premium function, contact us! Premium function, contact us! Premium function, contact us! 
Username:
Password:
Create a account
Making stock and economic news easier to read, bookmark and use!
 
  Submit Article Add a Feed Watchlist
NH to US Government - enough is enough

New legislation in the "Live free or die" state of New Hampshire outlines how they can and will "defy" the United States government and break from the union; as outlined by Thomas Jefferson, if certain frameworks are not adhered to.

Not since 1776 have we seen such gutsy ideals being brought to ink on paper in the form of a resolution. This is pretty major, for as it reads now, the federal government may already be in violation:


09-0274

09/01

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

SPONSORS: Rep. Itse, Rock 9; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Sen. Denley, Dist 3

COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

ANALYSIS

This house concurrent resolution affirms States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

09-0274

09/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and

Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, “First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;” and

Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and...

SOURCE: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html


Now, did I miss-read, or are there more states looking to pass this sort of bill:
"Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change;"

And here are the specific items of contention:


I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature."



NH may have lost it's "Old man on the Mountain" but they have not lost their gusto- Stay tuned, this is an interesting one...

other sources: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/

Rating: 0 (0 today) - Visits: 487 (4 today)
Read the full article | Bookmark this article(to my MFP account)

Comments on this item:

Nobody posted a comment yet


Post your comment
Your name:
 
E-mail Address(Not visible in comment):
 
 
Retype the number:
   
Your comment:
 




:8 :o? :) :P :/ :D :o :% :0/ :o| :? :o-
:DD :(( 8o :( 8D :N :Y :DDD 7| :luv: :\'( :(((

 
Feed of the Month
Wall Street Pit


OfficeDrop



Open Quark in InDesign








Site Owner: David
Location: Los Angeles
© 2006 - 2013 Help/FAQ | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | About us | Contact | Your feed on this site?